Hopkins Prize

The following are the Regulations for the WILLIAM HOPKINS PRIZE founded in memory of WILLIAM HOPKINS (1793-1866).

1. That the Prize be called "THE WILLIAM HOPKINS PRIZE"

2. That this Prize be adjudged once in three years.

3. That it be adjudged for the best original memoir, invention or discovery, in connextion with Mathematico-physical or Mathematico-experimental science that may have been published during the three years immediately preceding, but that the adjudicators be at liberty, if it seem to them advisable in any particular case, to award the Prize for a discovery in Mathematics alone, or in Experimental Physicsalone, or for one which has not been published within theforementioned period.

4. That it be confined to those who are or have been Members of the University of Cambridge.

5. That the fund be vested in the Cambridge Philosophical Society, and the Prize adjudged by three Fellows of the Society, nominated by the Council of the Society for each occasion.

6. That, in the event of any difficulty arising in carrying out the above provisions in any particular instance, either from lack of a prize-subject of sufficient merit, or from anyother cause, the Council be at liberty to carry over the amount of the Prize for that term towards augmenting the fund for future prizes, or to award it to someone not a member of the University.

Award of the William Hopkins Prize

1867 - SIR G. G. STOKES

1870 - J. CLERK MAXWELL

1873 - LORD RAYLEIGH

1876 - LORD KELVIN

1879 - SIR G. H. DARWIN

1882 - SIR R. T. GLAZEBROOK

1885 - W. M. HICKS

1888 - SIR H. LAMB

1891 - SIR J. J. THOMSON

1894 - W. D. NIVEN

1897 - SIR J. LARMOR

1900 - S. S. HOUGH

1903 - J. H. POYNTING

1906 - W. BURNSIDE

1909 - G. H. BRYAN

1912 - C. T. R. WILSON

1915 - R. A. SAMPSON

1918 - SIR F W. DYSON

1921 - SIR A. S. EDDINGTON

1924 - SIR J. H. JEANS

1927 - SIR G. I. TAYLOR

1930 - P. A. M. DIRAC

1933 - P. M. S. BLACKETT

1936 - E. A. MILNE

1939 - SIR J. D. COCKCROFT

1942 - H. J. BHABHA

1945 - C. F. POWELL

1948 - SIR J. LENNARD-JONES

1951 - R. A. LYTTLETON

1954 - M. RYLE

1957 - A. SALAM

1960 - M. J. LIGHTHILL

1963 - J. M. ZIMAN

1966 - A. KELLY

1969 - T. BROOKE BENJAMIN

1972 - A. HEWISH

1975 - S. W. HAWKING

1979 - D.P. McKenzie

1980 - Lord M. J. Rees

1985 - D.O. Gough

1988 - M.B. Green

1991 - S.K. Donaldson

1993 - R.D.E. Saunders

1996 - Sir J.E. Baldwin

1999 - P.K. Townsend

Publications

Discover our Journals & Books

From Darwin’s paper on evolution to the development of stem cell research, publications from the Society continue to shape the scientific landscape.

Membership

Join the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Become a Fellow of the Society and enjoy the benefits that membership brings. Membership costs £20 per year.

Join today

Upcoming Events

Show All

12

03

Towards a Net Zero World: Developing and applying new tools to understand how materials for Li and “beyond-Li” battery technologies function

Professor Dame Clare P. Grey

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term Honorary Fellows Lecture

More powerful, longer-lasting, faster-charging batteries – made from increasingly more sustainable resources and manufacturing processes – are required for low-carbon transport and stable electricity supplies in a “net zero” world. Rechargeable batteries are the most efficient way of storing renewable electricity; they are required for electrifying transport as well as for storing electricity on both micro and larger electricity grids when intermittent renewables cannot meet electricity demands. The first rechargeable lithium-ion batteries were developed for, and were integral to, the portable electronics revolution. The development of the much bigger batteries needed for transport and grid storage comes, however, with a very different set of challenges, which include cost, safety and sustainability. New technologies are being investigated, such as those involving reactions between Li and oxygen/sulfur, using sodium and magnesium ions instead of lithium, or involving the flow of materials in an out of the electrochemical cell (in redox flow batteries). Importantly, fundamental science is key to producing non-incremental advances and to develop new strategies for energy storage and conversion.  

This talk will start by describing existing battery technologies, what some of the current and more long-term challenges are, and touch on strategies to address some of the issues.  I will then focus on my own work – together with my research group and collaborators – to develop new characterisation (NMR, MRI, and X-ray diffraction and optical) methods that allow batteries to be studied while they are operating (i.e., operando). These techniques allow transformations of the various cell components to be followed under realistic conditions without having to disassemble and take apart the cell. We can detect key side reactions involving the various battery materials, in order to determine the processes that are responsible ultimately for battery failure.  We can watch ions diffusing in, and moving in and out of, the active “electrode” materials that store the (lithium) ions and the electrons, to understand how the batteries function.  Finally, I will discuss the challenges in designing batteries that can be rapidly charged and discharged.  
 

View Details

17

03

Acoustics of musical instruments - why is a saxophone like a violin?

Professor Jim Woodhouse

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term

Musical instruments like the clarinet and saxophone do not obviously have anything in common with a bowed violin string. This talk will explore the physics behind how these instruments work, and it will reveal some unexpectedly strong parallels between them. This is all the more surprising because all of them rely on strongly nonlinear phenomena, and nonlinear systems are notoriously tricky: significant commonalities between disparate systems are rare. For all the instruments, computer simulations will be used to give some insight into questions a musician may ask: What variables must a player control, and how? Why are some instruments “easier to play” than others?

View Details