Lewis Spurrier-Best works in the Science Centre at the Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Cambridge Campus and is one of two students to be awarded the new Sedgwick studentship by the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Prior to joining ARU Lewis studied his Master of Research in Cancer Biology and Bachelor of Science in Human Biology at Sheffield Hallam University.
Lewis is studying for his PhD in Dr Havovi Chichger’s lab where his research focuses on identifying new therapeutic targets for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is defined as the acute onset of non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, resulting in hypoxaemia. Up to 19% of all intensive care unit admissions worldwide are attributed to ARDS with a mortality rate of up to 40% in critical care patients. There is currently no treatment available for the vasculature permeability thought to be the underlying cause of hypoxemia in ARDS, mechanical ventilation is one of the main treatment options for the disease, however, mechanical ventilation does not treat the underlying cause and can cause further damage to the pulmonary vasculature.
Lewis’s research specifically focuses on how the bitter taste receptor T2R14, regulates the permeability of pulmonary vascular endothelium. T2R14 is a G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR) that is usually located in the oral cavity where it functions as a bitter taste receptor, however, it has recently been demonstrated to be expressed in the lung microvasculature where it has been shown to have a functional role in settings of ARDS. Agonists to T2R14 such as noscapine have been shown to have a barrier disrupting effect in cases of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced barrier dysfunction while siRNA knockdown of T2R14 was shown to have a barrier protective effect. Lewis is expanding on this research to study the effects of T2R14 antagonists and their potential barrier protective effects with the ultimate goal of identifying new therapeutic targets to treat the underlying cause of ARDS.
Show All
Kipling’s “Iron‒Cold Iron‒is master of them all” captures the familiar importance of metals as structural materials. Yet common metals are not necessarily hard; they can become so when deformed. This phenomenon, strain hardening, was first explained by G. I. Taylor in 1934. Ninety years on from this pioneering work on dislocation theory, we explore the deformation of metals when dislocations do not exist, that is when the metals are non-crystalline. These amorphous metals have record-breaking combinations of properties. They behave very differently from the metals that Taylor studied, but we do find phenomena for which his work (in a dramatically different context) is directly relevant.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, U.K. policy-makers claimed to be "following the science". Many commentators objected that the government did not live up to this aim. Others worried that policy-makers ought not blindly "follow" science, because this involves an abdication of responsibility. In this talk, I consider a third, even more fundamental concern: that there is no such thing as "the" science. Drawing on the case of adolescent vaccination against Covid-19, I argue that the best that any scientific advisory group can do is to offer a partial perspective on reality. In turn, this has important implications for how we think about science and politics.
Please Note: Due to building works, the CPS office at 17 Mill Lane, Cambridge is now closed until further notice. Business operations as usual. Please contact us by email only: philosoc@group.cam.ac.uk
Cambridge Philosophical Society17 Mill LaneCambridgeCB2 1RXUnited Kingdom
Office Hours: (Temporarily closed)Monday and Thursday -10am-12pm and 2pm-4pm.
philosoc@group.cam.ac.uk