It’s all relative

CPS Fellows visit the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Fellows of the Cambridge Philosophical Society outside the Cambridge Observatory at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Photo: Fellows of the Cambridge Philosophical Society outside the Cambridge Observatory at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Each year the The Cambridge Philosophical Society holds a number of free visits for members of the Society. Our most recent visit was to the Institute of Astronomy (IoA), Cambridge.

The University Observatory was founded in 1823 on a small site known as Gravel Hill, which had been used for gravel extraction. Our tour of the Institute of Astronomy and the Observatory was guided by Mr Mark Hurn, Information Manager and librarian at the IoA library within the Old Observatory building. The library includes a rare book room with astronomical books dating back to 1514 A.D. The dome of the Old Observatory building once contained a telescope, but is now empty. The building features on the cover of the CPS publication The Spirit of Inquiry by Susannah Gibson which celebrates the 200th anniversary of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Research at the department is made in a number of scientific areas, including exoplanets, stars, star clusters, cosmology, gravitational-wave astronomy, the high-redshift universe, AGN, galaxies and galaxy clusters. The Institute houses several telescopes on its site, which include The Northumberland Telescope donated by the Duke of Northumberland in 1833. The smaller Thorrowgood Telescope, on extended loan from the Royal Astronomical Society, a 36-inch Telescope, built in 1951 and the Three-Mirror Telescope.

Notable astronomers associated with our site, such as George Biddell Airy (CPS Fellow), James Challis, John Couch Adams, Robert Ball, Arthur Stanley Eddington (CPS Fellow) and Fred Hoyle to name but a few.

More information about the Institute of Astronomy can be found here: www.ast.cam.ac.uk

Inside the 1833  Northumberland Telescope at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Photo: Inside the 1833 Northumberland Telescope at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Dome of the Northumberland Telescope at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Photo: Dome of the Northumberland Telescope at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Share this article:

Themes

Publications

Discover our Journals & Books

From Darwin’s paper on evolution to the development of stem cell research, publications from the Society continue to shape the scientific landscape.

Membership

Join the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Become a Fellow of the Society and enjoy the benefits that membership brings. Membership costs £20 per year.

Join today

Upcoming Events

Show All

03

02

To Bend or to Break?  — new views on the hardening of metals

Professor Lindsay Greer

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term G.I. Taylor Lecture

Kipling’s “Iron‒Cold Iron‒is master of them all” captures the familiar importance of metals as structural materials.  Yet common metals are not necessarily hard; they can become so when deformed.  This phenomenon, strain hardening, was first explained by G. I. Taylor in 1934.  Ninety years on from this pioneering work on dislocation theory, we explore the deformation of metals when dislocations do not exist, that is when the metals are non-crystalline.  These amorphous metals have record-breaking combinations of properties.  They behave very differently from the metals that Taylor studied, but we do find phenomena for which his work (in a dramatically different context) is directly relevant.

View Details

17

02

Why there’s no such thing as “the” scientific advice

Professor Stephen John

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Lent Term

During the Covid-19 pandemic, U.K. policy-makers claimed to be "following the science". Many commentators objected that the government did not live up to this aim. Others worried that policy-makers ought not blindly "follow" science, because this involves an abdication of responsibility. In this talk, I consider a third, even more fundamental concern: that there is no such thing as "the" science. Drawing on the case of adolescent vaccination against Covid-19, I argue that the best that any scientific advisory group can do is to offer a partial perspective on reality. In turn, this has important implications for how we think about science and politics. 

View Details