Biological Reviews is No 1 in the Impact Factor rankings

Once again Biological Reviews is number 1 in the Impact Factor rankings for our group. Up from 12.82 in 2020 to 14.35 for 2021. 

Journal name2021 JIFTotal Citations
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS14.3519,206
BIOSCIENCE11.56624,496
CURRENT BIOLOGY10.985,124
Science China-Life Sciences10.3727,316
Physics of Life Reviews9.8332,121
PLOS BIOLOGY9.59344,888
BioScience Trends9.0832,711
eLife8.71389,502
BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH7.6343,299
BMC BIOLOGY7.36410,352
Biology Direct7.1732,618
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY6.754,824
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE6.69814,531
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES6.67162,963
Communications Biology6.54811,444
FASEB JOURNAL5.83459,831
Life Science Alliance5.7812,253

Tagged with:

Share this article:

Themes

Publications

Discover our Journals & Books

From Darwin’s paper on evolution to the development of stem cell research, publications from the Society continue to shape the scientific landscape.

Membership

Join the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Become a Fellow of the Society and enjoy the benefits that membership brings. Membership costs £20 per year.

Join today

Upcoming Events

Show All

13

10

Our Chiral Universe

Professor David Tong

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Michaelmas Term Larmor Lecture

The fundamental laws of physics look different when reflected in a mirror. This is the statement that the laws of physics have a handedness, what physicists call chirality. This is one of the most important facts that we know about the universe, a fact that, remarkably, goes a long way to fixing the mathematical structure of the laws of nature. I will explain how we know about this handedness, why it’s so important, and why there are still several chiral mysteries that remain unsolved.

View Details

27

10

Reflections on dementia research and ageing societies

Professor Carol Brayne CBE

  • 18:00 - 19:00 Bristol-Myers Squibb Lecture Theatre Michaelmas Term A.V. Hill Lecture

Dementia is a topic of considerable public interest. How empirical evidence has contributed to this societal awareness and indeed fear will be covered in this talk. It will span research from the 1980s when not much was understood about dementia up to contemporary perspectives. The focus will be on the epidemiological and public health evidence base, and how this relates to the results published from clinical and lab based research. The findings from UK and other high income countries of reduced age specific prevalence (%) will be explored, and the implications of results from brain based studies that dementia is not inevitable in the presence of ‘alzheimer’ type changes. The role of inequalities, risk varying across countries and time and our knowledge about protective factors have strengthened during recent years, and the balance of high risk with whole population approaches to reducing risk for society will be considered.

View Details